SPEND MANAGEMENT OUTLOOK

Beyond inflation: Understanding the forces reshaping healthcare spend

Health system leaders must look beyond inflation to understand the forces shaping cost, growth, and enterprise performance.

VizientArticle
By Dan Kistner, PharmD and Blaine Douglas, SVP/GM
13 min readJul 27, 2026
Supply chain and cost management
Key points
  •  

Business meeting in a modern conference room.

Healthcare leaders are entering the next planning cycle facing a familiar challenge: balancing financial sustainability with growing demands for access, innovation, workforce support, and long-term effectiveness. What’s changing is the nature of the decisions required to meet those demands.

Organizations traditionally have approached non-labor expense primarily through the lens of category management, contracting strategy, and cost control. Those priorities remain important, but they no longer tell the whole story. Healthcare spend now is shaped by more than price movement. Utilization, site-of-care changes, reimbursement dynamics, support availability, technology adoption, and service line growth all are influencing actual organizational spend.

Each healthcare spend category operates within its own complex ecosystem, and the decisions made within influence far more than category results; they affect how organizations deliver care, allocate resources, manage risk, and sustain long-term effectiveness across the system.

The interconnected nature of these decisions should change how leaders approach non-labor expense planning. Price movement remains important, but evaluating inflation in isolation is no longer sufficient. A price increase in one category may be manageable on its own; but when combined with higher volume, site-of-care shifts, payer controls, supply disruption, or infrastructure needs, the financial impact becomes greater.

2027 projection snapshot

Hospitals and health systems will enter 2027 with continued margin sensitivity, elevated expense pressure, and increasing variability across spend categories. While Kaufman Hall’s March 2026 National Hospital Flash Report showed month-over-month margin improvement, margins remained below 2025 levels and drug expense continued to be a primary driver of year-to-date expense growth.

Against that backdrop, Vizient projects a 3.54% increase in pharmaceutical prices for Vizient Pharmacy Program participants and a 3.39% average increase for the supply chain categories included in the analysis. These projections show broad but uneven pressure, with higher inflation concentrated in specialty medications, ambulatory pharmacy, IT hardware and software, purchased services, construction, capital equipment, and medical and surgical (MedSurg) products.

These projections measure price movement only. They don’t account for utilization, product mix, reimbursement, supply availability, or local contract performance—all of which may materially affect actual spend.

Enterprise projection snapshot: Pharmacy and supply chain 2027
Spend category2027 projected inflationChange from winter 2026What leaders should know
Pharmaceuticals overall3.54%0.70% ↑Pharmacy pressure is shifting toward ambulatory, specialty, and self-administered therapies.
Pharmacy portfolio
Contract products2.73%1.19% ↑ 
Non-contract products3.92%0.50% ↑ 
Pediatric facilities3.95%0.42% ↑ 
Acute2.85%-0.18% ↓ 
Ambulatory3.64%0.79% ↑ 
Provider-administered medications3.66%0.31% ↑ 
Self-administered medications3.62%1.19% ↑ 
Specialty and complex medications4.04%0.53% ↑ 
Supply chain overall3.39%0.61% ↑Broad, but uneven, price pressure across products, equipment, services, and indirect spend.
Capital and imaging equipment3.21%1.26% ↑Investment continues in imaging, monitoring, procedural capacity, and infrastructure modernization.
Capital equipment (medical)3.43%1.37% ↑ 
Imaging equipment2.96%1.16% ↑ 
Indirect spend and purchased services4.73%0.88% ↑The supply chain segment with the highest forecasted growth due to pressure concentrated in IT, construction, operational support, and purchased services contracts.
Capital equipment (non-medical)4.15% 
Construction4.70%1.00% ↑ 
Facilities3.21%-0.18% ↓ 
Food4.16%0.53% ↑ 
IT hardware/software6.29%0.63% ↑ 
Operational support services3.81%0.36% ↑ 
Laboratory1.87%0.05% ↑Lower projected inflation, but utilization is shifting toward point-of-care, rapid diagnostics, and specialty testing.
Consumables1.96%0.17% ↑ 
Equipment1.49%-0.36% ↓ 
Medical and surgical products3.05%0.02% ↑High-volume consumables remain vulnerable to raw material, tariffs, logistics, and supply volatility.
Medical supplies3.21%-0.12% ↓ 
Surgical supplies2.62%-0.31% ↓ 
Physician preference items2.55%0.30% ↑Procedural innovation and site-of-care shifts require stronger physician alignment and utilization governance.
Cardiology2.19%0.08% ↑ 
Neurological2.65%-1.27% ↓ 
Orthopedics2.92%1.38% ↑ 
Surgical services2.38%-0.45% ↓ 

Source: Vizient, Inc. Pharmacy Program participant data. April 2025-March 2026; Vizient analysis of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Energy Information Administration.

Notes: Pharmacy projections reflect pharmaceutical price changes for Vizient Pharmacy Program participants. Supply chain projections reflect estimated average market price changes across healthcare supply chain categories. Projections measure price movement only and don't account for utilization, product mix, reimbursement, supply availability, or local contract performance.

The forces behind the projections

The forces driving healthcare spend extend beyond category-level price movement. Pricing, utilization, reimbursement, innovation, workforce pressures, and site-of-care changes influence one another—and together affect care delivery planning, resource allocation, risk management, and organizational outcomes.

For pharmacy, financial risk is moving beyond traditional inpatient purchasing into ambulatory, specialty, and payer-controlled channels. Across supply chain categories, organizations are balancing cost management with growing demands for visibility and resiliency. Laboratory, capital equipment, physician preference items (PPI), and indirect spend and purchased services are becoming more closely tied to priorities such as access, throughput, digital transformation, infrastructure modernization, and long-term growth.

For health system leaders, the implication is clear: Non-labor expense management can no longer operate as a sourcing-only function. It must be grounded in the principles of a clinically integrated supply chain—connecting product, service, technology, and site-of-care decisions to clinical outcomes, workforce readiness, and financial sustainability.

Five priorities emerge from this year’s analysis

1. Leaders should treat inflation as enterprise risk rather than a single budgeting exercise.

Specialty and complex medications, ambulatory pharmacy, indirect spend and purchased services, capital equipment, and MedSurg products are experiencing different cost drivers and require different management approaches.

Takeaway: Inflation should be evaluated in the context of total spend drivers, including utilization, reimbursement, care delivery changes, and supply resiliency.

2. Organizations need greater visibility across sites of care and acquisition channels.

Care continues to move into ambulatory, outpatient, home-based, and non-acute settings, changing where products, drugs, and services are used and how spend is captured. Pharmacy benefit controls, payer site-of-care policies, ambulatory surgery center (ASC) growth, and specialty pharmacy access are making traditional hospital-based visibility less complete.

Takeaway: As spend moves across decentralized settings, health systems will need stronger connections across the care continuum.

3. Health systems should build stronger governance around high-cost and high-impact innovation.

Innovation is accelerating across advanced therapies, diagnostics, imaging, robotics, PPI, artificial intelligence-enabled tools, and digital infrastructure. These technologies may support growth, access, and clinical differentiation, but they also introduce new costs, reimbursement questions, and operating requirements. New drugs, devices, diagnostics, technology, and infrastructure investments will require cross-functional review.

Takeaway: Leaders should evaluate innovation through total cost of ownership, clinical value, workforce impact, reimbursement sustainability, and readiness to scale.

4. Pharmacy, supply chain, finance, and clinical leaders should align around total cost of care.

The greatest risks now sit at the intersection of clinical decisions, reimbursement, utilization, site of care, service line planning, and organizational capacity. Category decisions affect clinical outcomes, workforce readiness, and financial results.

Takeaway: Health systems that connect pharmacy, supply chain, finance, revenue cycle, IT, operations, and clinical leadership will be better positioned to manage margins, preserve access, support growth, and improve organizational outcomes.

5. Leaders should strengthen resiliency in sourcing, contracting, and supply assurance.

Tariff uncertainty, geopolitical disruption, raw material exposure, energy volatility, hardware constraints, and labor shortages continue to affect both products and services. Disruption risk remains a concern across MedSurg products, technology, equipment, purchased services, and pharmaceuticals.

Takeaway: Supplier diversification, contract discipline, inventory strategy, and early procurement planning are essential to reducing disruption risk.

Together, these priorities position non-labor expense management as an integrated approach—one that connects financial stewardship, clinical decision-making, resiliency, and patient access.

A smiling woman receiving medical treatment in a clinic.

Pharmacy highlights

Pharmacy remains one of the most visible and rapidly evolving areas of health system non-labor expense, yet the most significant changes are occurring beyond drug prices alone.

As therapies move across care settings, reimbursement models become more complex, and specialty channels expand, pharmacy decision-making becomes more dependent on capabilities such as care coordination, payer strategy, workforce readiness, and data visibility.

  • Ambulatory and specialty therapies are driving the next phase of pharmacy spend pressure. Acute care inflation remains comparatively lower at 2.85%, while ambulatory care is projected at 3.64%, and specialty and complex medications at 4.04%—the highest projected inflation among the major pharmacy market segments.

    Provider-administered therapies, self-administered medications, and advanced therapies require pharmacy leaders to manage beyond acquisition cost. Leaders should evaluate site of care, payer coverage, reimbursement, specialty pharmacy access, and organizational readiness, as these factors play a growing role in determining financial results and patient access.

  • Utilization growth may represent a greater financial risk than price inflation alone. Oncology comprises the largest share of analyzed pharmacy purchases at 25.59%, followed closely by autoimmune and inflammatory conditions at 23.39%. GLP-1 demand, cancer immunotherapies, oral oncolytics, immune globulin, biosimilars, and cell and gene therapies collectively illustrate why pharmacy leaders must manage demand, access, and reimbursement alongside acquisition cost.
  • Contracting, channel visibility, and payer strategy are essential to margin protection. Products covered by a Vizient contract are projected to increase 2.73%, compared with 3.92% for non-contract products, reinforcing the value of formulary alignment and contract portfolio utilization where clinically appropriate.

    But contracting alone isn’t sufficient. High-cost medications are flowing through more fragmented and specialized distribution channels as manufacturers, payers, and specialty pharmacy networks continue to reshape access and distribution. This requires stronger alignment across the health system to ensure appropriate access, reimbursement, and financial stewardship.

Organizations that treat pharmacy as an integrated component of growth, access, and financial planning are better positioned to manage both cost and outcomes in this evolving care environment.

A nurse adjusting an IV drip.

Supply chain, capital, and purchased services highlights

Scientists examining a brain scan.

Supply chain categories offer another example of how non-labor expense is integral to organizational outcomes. Categories once viewed primarily as operational support—including technology, purchased services, facilities, and capital infrastructure—now affect access, capacity, workforce effectiveness, and long-term resiliency.

At the same time, clinically oriented categories such as MedSurg products, laboratory, and PPI now directly influence care delivery planning, procedural growth, diagnostic capability, and total cost of care.

Investments in imaging, ambulatory capacity, diagnostics, technology infrastructure, and procedural innovation are helping determine where care is delivered, how efficiently patients move through the system, and how organizations position themselves for future growth.

  • Indirect spend, IT, and infrastructure are major cost drivers. Indirect spend and purchased services are projected to increase 4.73%, with IT hardware and software projected at 6.29%—the highest among all categories. Construction, operational support services, facilities, and non-medical capital equipment also are contributing to price pressure. These trends reinforce the need for stronger governance over purchased services, technology investments, facilities planning, and long-term infrastructure planning, particularly as organizations balance modernization efforts against continued margin pressure.
  • Capital and procedural spend are increasingly tied to access, throughput, and site-of-care strategy. Capital and imaging equipment are projected to increase 3.21%, reflecting continued investment in imaging, patient monitoring, clinical informatics, ambulatory procedural capacity, and rural health infrastructure modernization.

    Physician preference items are projected at 2.55%, but procedural innovation, ASC migration, robotics, advanced cardiovascular technologies, and orthopedic implant strategies continue to reshape spending patterns. These trends and investments require disciplined physician alignment, utilization governance, and total cost of ownership evaluation, as technology adoption influences both procedural growth and long-term cost results.

  • Resiliency and visibility are essential as utilization moves across settings. MedSurg products are projected to increase 3.05%, while laboratory is projected at 1.87%. Even where inflation is lower, utilization and sourcing risk remain important as care moves into ambulatory, outpatient, home-based, and decentralized settings.

    Health systems will need stronger visibility and planning across sites of care, supplier diversification, contract compliance, demand forecasting, and supply assurance to manage disruption risk, protect day-to-day reliability, maintain continuity of care, and support growth objectives.

A smiling woman receiving medical treatment in a clinic.

The path forward

Managing non-labor expense in 2027 will require more than responding to inflation. The challenge is no longer managing individual categories but understanding how these changes interact across the health system.

Health systems should focus on strengthening coordination across pharmacy, supply chain, finance, clinical leadership, and operations; improving visibility into utilization and spend across sites of care; and evaluating investments through the lens of long-term value, resiliency, and total cost of care.

The ability to connect decisions across the organization, translate market insights into action, and proactively address emerging risks will be a defining advantage in the years ahead.

Vizient resources
Healthcare enterprise preparedness assessment

These questions highlight key areas executive teams should examine as they refine their strategies for the year ahead.

Strategy

Leadership alignment and enterprise planning

  • Do supply chain leaders have executive and physician support for evaluating the appropriate use of medical devices, technologies, supplies, purchased services, and key suppliers?
  • Does an enterprise pharmacy leader have responsibility across inpatient and ambulatory care?
  • Are pharmacy and supply chain leaders included in strategic planning, including mergers and acquisitions?
  • Does the organization’s strategic plan include multiple dimensions of nonacute care such as ASCs, specialty pharmacy, retail pharmacy, pharmacy benefit management, standalone infusion, home infusion, and gene therapy delivery?
  • Does the organization participate in the Advanced Therapeutics Alliance for high-cost pharmaceuticals and advanced treatments?

Operational

Cross-functional coordination and payer readiness

  • Are supply chain and pharmacy leaders aligned with managed care to address payer interventions that affect patient care and financial results?
  • Do spend management teams—including pharmacy, MedSurg products, laboratory, capital equipment solutions, PPI, and indirect spend and purchased services—partner with government relations to address critical practice issues from an advocacy and legislative perspective?
  • Does human resources partner with pharmacy on negotiation of the organization’s pharmacy benefits program?

Financial

Margin visibility and investment planning

  • Do leaders have clear line of sight into margin across key spend management services, including MedSurg products, orthopedics, cardiology, surgery, and pharmacy?
  • Does the organization have an investment plan for ambulatory pharmacy and related services?
  • Does the organization maintain a formal capital budget for equipment and an investment plan for equipment, technology, purchased services, and infrastructure needs?
  • Is the team prepared to manage implementation of the Centers for Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program for Part D drugs?
  • For 340B organizations, is infrastructure in place to manage increased supplier transparency requirements to obtain pricing?
  • Do leaders know which patient populations are most likely to require high-cost treatments and interventions, such as cell and gene therapy or surgical robotics?

Authors

Dan Kistner

Dan Kistner, PharmD

Chief Clinical Officer, Spend Management

Dan Kistner, PharmD, is a senior healthcare executive at Vizient, Inc., where he serves as Chief Clinical Officer, Spend Management. He leads spend management strategies across pharmacy, medical/surgical, laboratory, capital equipment, physician preference items (PPI), and analytics. Since joining Vizient in 2012, Kistner has helped transform provider operations with a portfolio of over 243,000 contracted products across diverse care settings....

Blaine Douglas

Blaine Douglas, SVP/GM

Indirect Spend & Purchased Services

Blaine Douglas brings more than 30 years of experience in the healthcare industry. His areas of expertise and professional skills include healthcare operations, principally focused on operational efficiencies and expense control. Douglas leads the non-clinical consulting practice at Vizient, which includes the purchased services, supply chain, construction and facilities, and capital and equipment planning consulting service areas. Prior to joining...