Article

Capacity is the new capital

The next generation of health systems won't create competitive advantage by owning more assets. They'll create it by generating greater value from the assets they already own.

VizientKauffmanArticle
By Michael D. Busch, FACHE, Nicole (Nikki) Gruebling, DNP, RN, NEA-BC and Tom Stoffel, LSSBB
10 min readAug 4, 2026
Financial sustainabilityClinical operations and qualityWorkforce management and culture
Key points
  •  

Capacity is the new capital banner

Healthcare's traditional growth playbook has long relied on expanding assets to meet rising patient demand by adding hospitals, physician practices, and ambulatory care sites. That strategy historically strengthened organizational margins and balance sheets.

But in the face of today’s reality, that playbook no longer works. Health systems face extraordinary demands for capital at the very moment liquidity has become increasingly constrained. Margins remain under pressure. Workforce shortages make it difficult to staff new and existing facilities. And patients expect care that is easier to access, better coordinated, and available on their terms.

Yet when emergency departments fill, specialty clinics book months in advance, or hospital occupancy climbs above target, executive teams often ask: Where can we build more capacity?

But the real constraint isn't how much capacity an organization owns, it’s how effectively that capacity is deployed. Adding beds, clinics, or operating rooms rarely fixes operational friction. It simply expands the footprint of inefficiency before the assets they already own are fully maximized.

Less capital, more value

Capacity is healthcare's most overlooked strategic resource. It is also dynamic rather than fixed. Capacity is created—and diminished—by flow.

Tomorrow's leading health systems won't create value by continuously adding assets but by unlocking the capacity they already have. Every operating room, clinic schedule, inpatient bed, infusion chair, and care team represents capital already deployed. And every avoidable admission, delayed discharge, unnecessary transfer, or underutilized clinic schedule is inefficient use of that capital. Operational decisions either protect those scarce resources or erode them.

Traditional balance sheets measure buildings, equipment, and cash. They don’t measure delayed discharges. They don’t measure patient time spent waiting for beds. They don’t measure unused operating room time. They don’t measure patients who sought care somewhere else because access took too long.

The big question: Are you extracting enough value from the assets you already own?

Unlocking value already on the balance sheet

A Vizient case-based analysis of a $2.5 billion integrated delivery network demonstrates what's possible when organizations optimize existing assets before expanding them. For a Great State Health—representative mid-size health system and flagship tertiary medical center—improving inpatient portfolio distribution alone could result in:

  • 853 fewer low- and medium-acuity inpatient discharges annually
  • 2,782 inpatient days freed for higher-acuity care
  • $11.6 million in annual cost savings
  • Up to $4.4 million in incremental revenue through higher-value backfill

This translates not just to volume reduction, but also capacity preservation for patients who need the highest level of care while improving financial performance—without building additional facilities.

Source: Analysis excludes 0-17 age group. All sources: Clinical Practice Solutions Center; Vizient Clinical Data Base; Vizient Operational Data Base; Impact of Change, 2025; Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample, 2021; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; proprietary Sg2 All-Payer Claims Data Set, 2023; the following 2023 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Limited Data Sets: Carrier, Denominator, Home Health Agency, Hospice, Outpatient, Skilled Nursing Facility; Claritas Pop-Facts, 2025; Sg2 Inpatient and Outpatient Hospital-Specific Payment Calculator, fiscal years 2022-2026; Sg2 analysis, 2026.
Your 60-second read
  • Optimizing capacity rather than expanding it is healthcare's next competitive advantage, as leading health systems unlock greater value by activating and preserving hidden capacity within their existing assets.
  • Every avoidable admission, delayed discharge, and underutilized operating room and clinic schedule depletes scarce capacity and weakens financial performance.
  • Leading organizations use AI, command centers and real-time data to create new capacity through enterprise coordination, smarter care allocation and operational redesign rather than capital investment.
  • Health systems that manage capacity with the same discipline as financial capital improve patient access, strengthen margins, and create sustainable long-term growth.
  • The future belongs to organizations that create a new source of enterprise value through optimizing patient flow and technology instead of adding more buildings, beds, and clinics.

This article is part of the Vizient Access and Capacity Framework series, which explores how health systems can improve access, optimize enterprise capacity, and strengthen financial performance through operational transformation. Explore our other articles:

Stop building capacity. Start preserving it.

Once organizations stop asking where to build more capacity, a more strategic question emerges: Where can we unlock “hidden capacity” from the assets we already own and are misusing?

Leading organizations recognize that capacity is a scarce enterprise asset that must be preserved, allocated, and continuously optimized. The greatest opportunity is to recover the capacity that already exists but is trapped by operational inefficiencies.

Think about every avoidable admission, delayed discharge, unnecessary transfer, or underutilized clinic schedule as a withdrawal from your organization's capacity balance sheet. Each one consumes scarce resources without creating value. Preserving capacity means ensuring those resources are available for the patients who need them most by preventing unnecessary admissions, directing lower-acuity patients to the most appropriate care settings, and reducing operational friction throughout the enterprise.

Approximately 30% of inpatient admissions are low acuity and represent a meaningful opportunity for organizations to redirect patients to more appropriate care settings as they preserve tertiary resources. Realizing that opportunity, however, requires expanding access to care in lower-acuity settings.

A recent Vizient Performance Improvement Program Specialty Care Access benchmarking study found that 97% of specialty clinics operate at least five days each week, yet only 28% offer appointments outside traditional business hours. Nearly 90% use telehealth, but most organizations reserve it primarily for established patient follow-up visits instead of new consultations or urgent care.

Those limitations are becoming increasingly consequential. Wait times for new patients remain elevated across every high-volume specialty, while overall evaluation and management visits are projected to grow 17% over the next decade. Health systems cannot build their way out of that demand.

Preserving capacity is a growth strategy. To generate greater value from the assets they already own, leading health systems direct patients to the most appropriate care setting, redesign care delivery rather than simply digitizing existing workflows, and use technology to enhance decision-making instead of automating inefficient processes.

Above all, they manage capacity with the same rigor they apply to financial capital—not simply through better operations, but through smarter asset management.

Hidden capacity by the numbers

Most health systems already have more capacity than they realize. These benchmarks reveal where operational redesign can unlock it.

  • 97% of specialty clinics operate five or more days each week but only 28% offer appointments outside traditional business hours
  • 89% use telehealth, but primarily for follow-up visits
  • Only 27% systematically monitor patient access barriers
  • 59% of organizations use advanced practice providers for new specialty patients, yet only 35% allow them to manage their own patient panels
Source: Vizient Performance Improvement Programs Improve Specialty Care Access benchmarking study, 2025
The capacity value chain graphic

Capacity is an enterprise strategy

Patients don’t experience your organizational chart. They experience how seamless care flows across your health system.

Yet many organizations continue to manage inpatient capacity, ambulatory access, and financial performance as disconnected priorities rather than as interdependent drivers of enterprise performance. Every delayed specialty appointment fuels emergency department demand. Poor transfer decisions consume tertiary resources. Discharge delays prevent the next patient from receiving care.

The Vizient Performance Improvement Programs Improve Specialty Care Access Collaborative found that organizations with executive sponsorship, shared accountability, and enterprise governance achieve more sustainable improvements than those that pursue disconnected departmental initiatives. The same is true for performance. Improving one department isn't a victory if the patient journey suffers elsewhere.

Health systems can unlock additional capacity without expanding their asset base by strengthening centralized command centers for real-time care coordination, using AI to improve patient communication and scheduling, redirecting patients to existing post-acute and ambulatory assets, leveraging strategic partners, and using enterprise analytics to identify opportunities that would otherwise remain hidden.

Leading organizations measure success by enterprise outcomes: improved access, seamless patient flow, stronger financial performance, and better patient experience. They manage capacity as a portfolio of enterprise assets, continuously allocating finite resources to their highest-value use.

The organizations that win will manage capacity differently

The Great State Health case study demonstrates what this looks like in practice. Across five access and capacity initiatives, the organization could unlock up to $88.9 million in annual cost savings or as much as $127.6 million in incremental revenue. None of it depends on new construction or major capital investment. Instead, it comes from redesigning how existing capacity is managed, allocated, and utilized. That's a fundamentally different definition of growth.

While healthcare has long measured success by the assets it accumulated, tomorrow's leaders will be measured by the value they generate from those assets. That changes how they invest and how they measure success—not by isolated departmental gains, but by how effectively the enterprise delivers better access, stronger financial performance, and a seamless patient journey.

The next generation of health systems won't be defined by the size of their campuses. They'll be defined by how intelligently they orchestrate the assets they already own.

Buildings depreciate. Capacity appreciates—but only when it’s actively managed.

Contributors to this article include Steve Carpenter, VP Networks; Jodi Eisenberg, VP Networks; Barbara Seymour, VP Networks; Nicole Spatafora, AVP Performance Improvement.

Four investments that generate the highest return on capacity

Before acquiring more buildings, beds, or clinics, organizations should invest in:

  • Enterprise governance: Executive sponsorship, physician leadership, and shared accountability accelerate decision-making across the organization.
  • Standardized workflows: Consistent referral pathways, scheduling templates, and intake procedures reduce variation and improve throughput.
  • Team-based care: Routine follow-up and lower-complexity patients are intentionally shifted to advanced practice providers to expand access without adding FTEs.
  • Data transparency: Enterprise dashboards make unused capacity visible so leaders can continuously rebalance demand across the system.
Source: Vizient Performance Improvement Programs Improve Specialty Care Access Collaborative
Case study: How Baptist Health unlocked capacity without adding beds

Baptist Health launched a systemwide initiative to reduce emergency department boarding and improve patient flow across its 12-hospital, $2 billion health system. Instead of expanding capacity through construction, leaders focused on improving throughput by redesigning processes, reducing length of stay, and driving executive accountability.

Drawing inspiration from airlines, rideshare services, and quick-service restaurants, the health system reimagined patient flow with key strategies. They centralized operations, conducted daily multidisciplinary rounds, standardized discharge workflows, set an enterprise-wide discharge-by-11 a.m. goal, created discharge lounges and "ghost beds," smoothed surgical schedules, and used predictive analytics to forecast demand seven days in advance. Executive leaders maintained daily oversight while teams streamlined discharge, room turnover, and patient transfers.

Results

  • Reduced average discharge processing time from 201 minutes to 80 minutes while increasing discharges before 11 a.m. from 7% to 29%—a threefold improvement.
  • Cut patient-out-to-patient-in times by 50%, reduced length of stay by approximately 30%, and decreased variation in length of stay across urban hospitals by 28%.
  • Created the equivalent capacity of a 32-bed inpatient unit without capital investment, enabling the system to admit more patients while reducing emergency department boarding and improving access to care.
Learn more about Vizient Networks, where healthcare leaders connect with trusted peers, evidence-based insights, leadership development, and performance improvement strategies designed to help organizations achieve and sustain top performance. Backed by Vizient's more than 25 years of research into what drives top-performing health systems, Vizient Networks helps leaders translate proven strategies into measurable, enterprise-wide impact.

Authors

Michael D Busch

Michael D. Busch, FACHE

Senior Vice President, Member Networks & Operations

Mike serves as Senior Vice President, Member Networks & Operations for Vizient Inc. where he leads national peer c-suite networks for health system CFOs, COOs, Payer Strategy and the Atlantic CEO Network. Responsible for engagement of health system senior executives, he encourages Members to Connect, Share, Learn, Improve and Advance performance while addressing the most pressing clinical, market, operational and...

Nicole Gruebling

Nicole (Nikki) Gruebling, DNP, RN, NEA-BC

Vice President, Member Networks

Nicole (Nikki) is responsible for the Vizient Chief Nurse, Quality and Medical Executives National and System Clinical Executive Networks. A nurse for over 25 years, with an emphasis on nursing leadership, Nikki joined Vizient in 2018 as a senior networks director with National Networks. In this role, she led the development of new networks, which hold strategic priority for Vizient...

Tom Stoffel

Tom Stoffel, LSSBB

Senior Vice President

As Kaufman Hall Senior Vice President, Tom serves key health systems across the U.S., managing large and complex improvement efforts for top Kaufman Hall clients. In this role, Tom leads diverse teams in identifying, framing and executing client cost, quality and growth opportunities. He is a trusted advisor, thought leader and point of contact for chief executive officers and their...